I refuse to be quiet about the silencing and harassment campaigns linked to the trans lobby. I’ve been screaming from the mountain tops about them for fully 10 years now.
If you were okay with naked men in girls’ gym locker rooms or violent men raping female inmates in women’s prisons or fetishistic men taking coveted spots in battered women’s shelters… If you said, “What’s the big deal?” when scores of 15-year-old girls started lining up for elective double mastectomies. If you poo pooed the horror when you learned that the gender industry is literally sterilizing children with the very same drugs used to chemically castrate gay men in the 1950s… then maybe I’m still shouting into the void. I’m not sure anything I could say beyond this would matter to you. We are not operating on the same wavelength, let alone the same planet. This is all deeply toxic, male supremacist philosophy that creates billionaires by packaging self-hatred to vulnerable teenage girls and feeding the deviant fetishes of pornsick boys who discovered Hentai when their parents handed them a phone at age 11.
I have long said that whenever gender identity wins, women always lose. And we do. I maintain that it hits females the hardest. But it’s utterly toxic for men, too. Bad ideas create victims, and the body count of this insidious ideology is skyrocketing.
Early reports from the Charlie Kirk assassination suggested that the weapon recovered contained trans propaganda—a chilling symbol of how this ideology can fuel real-world violence. I don’t know if these reports have merit. What I do know is that the violence that claimed his life yesterday is violence with which most of us on the frontlines of this issue have been repeatedly threatened time and time again. There’s an entire website dedicated to collecting receipts of this violent ideation. It’s called Terfisaslur.com, and people should absolutely know what dissenters from the gender cult endure on the regular. A “TERF,” for those who don’t know, is a trans exclusionary radical feminist, only you don’t actually have to be a feminist to be a TERF; you just have to be a woman with the temerity to resist the gender cult.
I refuse to hate an entire political party or the people within it. I refuse to hate people who get sucked into the gender cult either. But I will remain unapologetically loud about how deadly this specific ideology remains. For years, some of us have been screaming into the void about its destructive consequences, and yet most people still aren’t listening.
In the 1960s, UC Berkeley became a Mecca for free expression. Students and activists from across the country flocked there, convinced that a truly liberal education meant defending the right to speak unpopular ideas—even those they despised. The very term ‘liberal’ once carried the connotation of liberality: a wide-open approach to dialogue, debate, and dissent.
But how far we’ve drifted. Today, the same institution that birthed the Free Speech Movement is often associated with shutting down speakers, disinviting those deemed offensive, and corralling expression within “approved zones.” What was once a beacon of intellectual openness is now a cautionary tale about how quickly the guardians of liberalism can become the gatekeepers of orthodoxy.
The cost of dissent today is tangible and extreme. Take Ben Shapiro, for example. When he spoke at UC Berkeley in 2017, the university and city spent an estimated $600,000 on security—police from all nine Bay Area counties, concrete barriers, metal detectors, and bag checks—just to ensure he could speak safely.
The Overton window has shifted radically. What was once considered the liberal defense of freedom is now treated as suspect or even dangerous. Today’s liberals, once the champions of free speech, increasingly adopt the tactics of suppression; today’s conservatives, once dismissed as rigid traditionalists, have become the radicals insisting on the right to dissent.
This isn’t merely philosophical to me. It’s horrified, traumatic lived experience, gleaned from my time spent at the tip of the spear in the great transgender debate. I was once interrupted at 6 am on a family vacation by a rabidly unwell man using a number of different accounts to call me using Facebook messenger before blowing my phone up with threats of physical harm and graphic images including pictures of his penis.
In 2017, when we tried to host an event at UW Tacoma defending the legal definition of womanhood, our panel was shouted off stage and swarmed by a mob of protestors. Police told us it was unsafe even to leave the building. One of our unexpected speakers, a lesbian detransitioner, later informed me that she was being required to take her college courses remotely, as her classmates and professors had deemed her an unsafe person due to her transphobic views.
Later that year, at a community gathering in eastern Washington, a trans-identified man with a history of violent rhetoric interrupted my speech, locked eyes with me, and announced his plan to personally arm trans veterans to equip them to fight people like me. For a moment, I genuinely wondered if that day would be my last. Two years later, at a rally in Vancouver, the hostility of the crowd was so severe that five men had to form a human shield around me just to keep the mob at bay.
And I’m not alone. I’ve watched my friends and co-laborers in this fight be abused, fired, blacklisted, slandered, and silenced too many times to count. Just a few examples:


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
Amy Hamm, a British Columbia nurse, faced disciplinary action after expressing gender-critical views online, identifying as a nurse. The British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM) found her statements discriminatory and unprofessional, leading to a one-month suspension and a $93,639 fine. Hamm has appealed the decision in the BC Supreme Court. She may lose her license.
These are not isolated stories but part of a pattern: the silencing, harassment, and destruction of those who dare to dissent from the new orthodoxy.
One of the reasons I take the Charlie Kirk situation personally because I see in him what I have seen so few defend: someone working tirelessly to make it safe for others to speak, even when you don’t agree with every position they hold. And yet, I also feel a profound sense of betrayal at the silence and apathy of Christian friends who know damn well how important this is—and say nothing when they see us harassed, shamed, or attacked on their threads.
These are not abstract debates. They are my life, and the lives of everyone I care about who refuses to bow to coercion. I have faced threats that made me fear for my life, and I continue to speak because the cost of silence is far greater. The fight for the freedom to speak, think, and dissent is urgent, immediate, and deeply personal. If we do not stand for it now, we risk letting the defenders of liberty be replaced by enforcers of conformity—and the world we once believed in will be lost.
I'm working to treat my writing like a job, so if you appreciate my writing, I would be so grateful if you would consider investing in a paid subscription. I try to keep my costs low, but my family thanks you for every dollar you invest in my writing. Thanks so much for your support!


I’m so sorry for all the sexual harassment and political violence you and your fellow gender-critical feminist activists have endured, Kaeley! I’m a social liberal, I’m all for gay marriage, LGBT civil rights, gay adoption, and celebrating Pride Month. But I also believe in women’s rights and that female-only spaces should be protected. We can balance those two things as a society, equal rights and anti-discrimination protections for Trans people and women being protected from biological men encroaching on their spaces and fairness in women’s sports. There is indeed a heavy cost for those who speak publicly against gender ideology. Radical leftists will go after you with a vengeance. You, Kathleen Stock, J.K. Rowling, Julie Bindel, and many others experienced this first hand.
But you’ve done the right thing. Gender presentation can be changed, biological sex can’t. That’s just science! It’s doesn’t make anyone “Transphobic” to acknowledge that gender-affirming care for minors is barbaric, immoral and does irreversible damage to children’s bodies. Nor to point out that Trans folks competing in women’s sports is unfair and dangerous. Nor to say that biological boys don’t belong in girl’s changing rooms or bathrooms. Trans radicals do nothing for Trans people as a whole and are basically terrorists.
They make Transgender people look bad when most just want to live their lives and that’s it and give ammunition to the legitimate transphobes on the right.
Biological men in women’s prisons? No way, Jose! That’s not okay! I call on President Trump and Attorney General Bondi to launch a probe into Trans radicalism in the United States. FBI Director Kash Patel should coordinate with them on that. I also call for legislation to be passed banning gender-affirming care for minors and the closure of clinics that aren’t following the law. I call on the Democratic Party to switch its stance on gender-affirming care for minors and join the GOP in fighting this monstrosity! It’s time for a radical shift in how we view these issues in this country and it has already begun. I’m not a conservative but I don’t need to be to see biological sex matters by the way, there are only two sexes, that’s it.
I suspect Antifa was behind Charlie’s assassination and that his stance on these very issues has something to do with it. Antifa must be declared a terrorist group by the Trump Justice Department. They are every bit as dangerous as the KKK, Neo-Nazis, Islamists, or black separatists. Antifa is a hate group and should be classified as such and is the modern day version of the Weather Underground. As to the Trans Lobby their days are numbered. Their decline has begun which is why they are getting more aggressive, it’s a sign of desperation.
"I have long said that whenever gender identity wins, women always lose."
So true and so sad. I remember when they used to test for male genes and hormones in Olympic athletes wanting to participate in womens' events.
As you note, whatever the solution, it seems women always lose. I remember saying during the 70's, "Back in the bad old days, if a man got a young woman pregnant out of wedlock, the family and community would insist that he marry the young lady or run him out of town. Maybe that didn't always result in the best marriages, but now, if a man gets a young lady pregnant out of wedlock and offers to pay for half the abortion, he's considered a Mensch. Is that really better for the woman?"