Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Hannaford's avatar

God bless you sister, for your integrity.

My view about voting for a candidate is that it should never be the person who is being voted for. Only the political platform.

Even if there should ever be a candidate so wonderful that I emotionally want to think that I am voting for that person, this is a wrong way to think.

We need to vote for what we hope that person will accomplish while in office based on what they promise. Moral character is an ideal and a luxury. This was probably always true.

Expand full comment
J. Mark Lane's avatar

You can't fault yourself for not being omniscient. Only God is omniscient. Discernment is not perfection, it is something we learn through introspection and (in my view) studying the Gospel. I personally don't think discernment is a gift from God, it's a gift we give ourselves.

And speaking of perfection, there are no perfect politicians, because there are no perfect humans. We cannot fault ourselves for the flaws of the politicians we vote for, that's silly. They are the ones who will answer for their sins, not us.

I strongly dislike Donald Trump. But I voted for him, three times. And I don't regret it. He appointed the judges who ended the horror known as Roe v Wade, among many other things. But more importantly, the only other realistic options have been people whose views and policies seem to me to come straight from the enemy.

If discernment is relevant to politics (doubtful), then I think what it means is to use the power of your vote to support the lesser of two (or more) evils. Simple as that. I think you are making a mistake in imposing guilt on yourself because people you believed in turned out to be flawed. All people are flawed. Keep that in the forefront of your mind and you'll be less likely to be disappointed?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts